I have not flown my.plane at this time. I have flown a friend's V1. With the upgrades and free battery I couldn't resist. I know the plane will be awesome. Buying from China Hobby was a great experience so far. I received my plane in less than a week. Just waiting on my motor to come in since mine is of the 1st batch and suggested to be replaced.
As the owner of the V1, I simply couldn't resist buying the V2! Not only for the new features, but also for its stunning looks.
I haven't flown it yet, but I've finished assembling and setting everything up. I must say, the upgrades might seem like small touches, but they make a world of difference!
I can only assume it flies as amazingly as the first version. And visually, what a beauty!
My only small disappointment is the lack of an electronic sequencer for the nose gear doors. A 6-channel receiver is no longer enough, and programming the door sequence takes a bit of learning. But hey, we fly RC planes because we love tinkering with this kind of stuff, right? So it's really not a big deal!
Personally, I used ChatGPT to help me configure the sequence on my Spektrum iX14+, and everything now works perfectly.
Anyway, a big thank you to CNHL for this fantastic release! I absolutely love this plane and can't wait to get it in the air!
I love my V1 so I ordered the V2 as soon as I could when it was available in the USA. I was NOT notified via email that I would need to please or solder new connectors for my "first batch" model. I found out via Facebook :(. However CNHL customer service has been above and beyond making sure they make it right by me. Jasmine was awesome! If the v2 flies 1/2 as good as the v1 this plane will be a winner! The upgraded retracts are my favorite new upgrade, gear door is kinda of. let down ...should be automatically sequenced with gears ... the reverse thrust option is nice as well! I recommend the Airplane for pilots who ENJOY a true locked in airframe.
This is my second Tucano. The V2 is a quality upgrade. The CG locations are in 3 versions: one marked on the wood inside, the second one on the flyer and the third in the manual, all slightly different. Changing the connectors is no big deal if you have experience. I’ll assume a new motor is coming anyway. Sequencing the door was a new Jeti experience..knowledge for another model. Overall, a great model.
This is a great flying airplane... Unfortunately I crashed. WHEN WILL REPLACEMENT PARTS BE AVAILABLE!!??
I recently purchased two ChinaHobbyLine 3700mAh 22.2V 6S 40C LiPo Batteries with XT60 Plugs directly from ChinaHobbyLine.com, and I couldn't be happier with the experience.
First off, the United States shipping was incredibly fast and completely free, which is a massive plus when you're eager to get out and fly.
These batteries fit perfectly on my HGLRC Nblade 7 Pro FPV quad. The weight distribution is spot on, and they lock in securely without any issues. In the air, the performance is stellar. I am getting approximately 12 minutes of flight time when keeping it at moderate cruising speeds, which provides plenty of stick time to enjoy the scenery and practice lines.
Highly recommended for anyone looking for reliable power and excellent value!
Title: Impressive Voltage Sag Performance Under Heavy Loads
I tested two CNHL Lightning 6S 6000mAh LiHV batteries against four ManiaX 6S 5800mAh HV packs in my SAB ilGoblin 590, equipped with a Scorpion motor, Tribunus III ESC, and VBar telemetry logging.
Both battery types were purchased new for this helicopter and had undergone several charge/discharge cycles before testing. Their manufacturing dates were unknown, so previous storage-related aging could not be determined.
Internal Resistance
* CNHL: approximately 3.5mΩ/cell
* ManiaX: approximately 1.9–2.1mΩ/cell
Based on these readings, I initially expected ManiaX to perform better under heavy loads. However, the actual flight logs showed some surprising results.
High-Load Test Results
CNHL Lightning (October 13):
* Pack #1: 158.8A / 19.9V (1,492mAh discharged)
* Pack #2: 150.3A / 19.9V (984mAh discharged)
ManiaX HV (October 28):
* Pack #1: 146.4A / 19.4V (422mAh discharged)
* Pack #2: 150.0A / 19.8V
* Pack #3: 143.7A / 19.6V (425mAh discharged)
All voltage/current pairs are simultaneous measurements from the VBar logs.
Interestingly, the CNHL packs maintained 19.9V at approximately 150–159A, despite having already discharged around 1,000–1,500mAh.
The ManiaX packs experienced greater voltage sag at similar current levels, even though the selected high-load events occurred relatively early in their discharge cycles.
Low-Load Performance
At moderate loads of approximately 30–50A, ManiaX generally maintained slightly higher voltage, consistent with its lower charger-measured internal resistance.
However, this advantage was less apparent during the highest-current events. State-of-charge differences also affect these comparisons.
Important Test Conditions
The CNHL tests were conducted at approximately 18°C, while the ManiaX tests were performed at approximately 10°C.
These were estimated ambient temperatures, not measured battery temperatures. Lower temperatures can significantly increase voltage sag, so the results cannot establish that CNHL is inherently superior under identical conditions.
The tests were conducted on different dates with different flight profiles.
Weight and Usable Capacity
* CNHL: approximately 710g / 6000mAh
* ManiaX: approximately 820g / 5800mAh
The CNHL is about 110g lighter per pack.
Using my normal discharge limits, both batteries provide nearly identical practical usable capacity of approximately 3,950mAh, targeting around 3.80V per cell after resting.
Final Verdict
Despite its higher measured internal resistance, the CNHL Lightning delivered excellent high-current performance in my actual flight tests.
While ManiaX generally showed slightly better voltage retention under moderate loads, CNHL remained highly competitive during aggressive collective pitch maneuvers.
The temperature difference prevents a definitive conclusion about which battery has intrinsically lower voltage sag. Nevertheless, CNHL’s combination of strong high-load performance, significantly lower weight, and excellent value makes it a very impressive battery.
I’m extremely satisfied with the CNHL Lightning 6000mAh and would definitely buy it again.
Full VBar telemetry graphs showing RPM, voltage, current, and ESC PWM are attached for reference.
I’ve been testing the CNHL Lightning 6S 6000mAh LiHV batteries against ManiaX 6S 5800mAh HV packs in my SAB ilGoblin 590, using a Scorpion motor and a Scorpion Tribunus ESC with VBar telemetry logging.
My main focus was voltage sag under heavy collective pitch loads, with peak currents reaching approximately 150–160A.
Interestingly, the CNHL packs measured around 3.5mΩ per cell on my charger, compared to approximately 2mΩ for the ManiaX packs. Based on these readings, I initially expected the ManiaX batteries to maintain voltage better.
However, in some of my high-load flight logs, the CNHL maintained approximately 19.9V at around 150A, while the ManiaX dropped to approximately 19.4–19.8V under similar current loads.
One important limitation is that the tests were performed under different conditions. The ManiaX tests were conducted at approximately 10°C, while the CNHL tests were around 18°C. Battery temperature can significantly influence voltage sag, so this was not a perfectly controlled comparison.
Results also varied between flights, but overall I found the CNHL’s high-load performance very competitive with the more expensive ManiaX packs.
Another significant advantage is weight. My CNHL packs weigh approximately 710g, compared to 820g for the ManiaX — a saving of around 110g per pack.
Despite the slightly different rated capacities, both batteries also provided very similar usable capacity in my setup.
Overall, I’m impressed with the CNHL Lightning 6000mAh. It offers competitive high-current performance, noticeably lower weight, and excellent value for money. I would definitely consider buying more.
Batteries seem really good in both a Habu XS EDF jet as well as a couple of other aircraft. They’re relatively light with plenty of punch and little voltage sag at full power.
I used these batteries for a race meeting and found them to be comparable to batteries from other brands, they had good punch and the capacity taken out of them at the end of a run was in line with other racers.
Spedizione super veloce e ben confezionate e graditi gli adesivi inclusi. Ho già acquistato batterie che uso già da tempo e sono molto affidabili e ora proverò per la prima volta il tipo shorty.
Spedizione veloce, pacco ben confezionato e packaging ottimo graditi gli adesivi inclusi nelle confezioni. Batterie ottime all'aspetto ben fatte e curate nei minimi particolari, già acquistate altre batterie in precedenza ma non shorty e sono molto affidabili, ora non resta che caricarle e provarle.
Excellents lipos! great performance, same mah in a smaller and lighter battery
Ideal power to weight ratio for long flight times plus plenty of punch when needed.
Heavy 5" Freestyle with 5037 Pizza Cutters easily manages 5 minutes flight time cruising around at 80kph with this pack.
Plus, CNHL customer service communication is fantastic.
these are becoming my favorite batteries..I have one that's like 3 or 4 years old, still all cells are good, and I fly my batts hard.
The power difference between these batteries and my Powerhobby batteries is night and day. On my imars d300 the ir is about 1.4 per cell on average at 3.8 volts. The ir readings from the imars d300 are obviously not perfectly accurate but 1.4 is by far the lowest ir that I have seen for any of my other batteries. For the price these batteries are unbeatable.
Nagyon jó a termék, csak ajánlani tudom!
Gyors volt a szállítás!
Köszönöm!
Arrived and I haven't got to use it yet , but it is a nicely packaged battery